# Lost nfts due to smart wallets having different addresses on different chains Crit/High · Three Sigma · Omnichain RWA tokenisation · 27th January, 2024 Finding 3S-MetaZero-H02 of the MetaZero Omnichain NFTs security review. - Protocol: https://metazero.gg/ - Report: /reports/metazero-i - Source: https://cdn.sanity.io/files/qoqld077/production/1b1ab4ff365756fe1d86767f1e06744407570f5a.pdf --- ### Description [send()](https://github.com/threesigmaxyz/metazero-issues-external/blob/master/src/ONFTV2-721C.sol#L98) sends the tokens to the same address that called the function. Some smart contract wallets may have different addresses on different chains (or even chains with different address generation). ### Recommendation Let the user specify a destination address to send the nfts to. ### Status Addressed in 5f138f1. --- Related findings: - [_crossTransfer(...) reverts for smart contracts that don't share the same address on different chains](https://0xsimao.com/findings/fuji-finance-cross-transfer-reverts-share): Fuji Finance - [Reusing the same rho and pubKey in different deposits leads to lost tokens](https://0xsimao.com/findings/singularity-reusing-rho-pub-deposits): Singularity